Bitcoin ($BTC) has experienced a significant drop in accumulation levels. In particular, the accumulation of $BTC is declining regardless of rising price levels. GlassNode data shows Bitcoin accumulation propensity scores have been significantly reduced, indicating the minimization purchasing pressure brought about by a large cohort. Therefore, this calm accumulation highlights the risk of supply overhangs if it does not revive.
The #bitcoin accumulation trend score has softened, and despite rising prices, confidence from a large cohort has settled.
Lightweight accumulation indicates a more careful bid and the market becomes vulnerable to supply overhangs unless demand refocuses.
https://t.co/dlxektrhu2 pic.twitter.com/z57mdedtnd– GlassNode (@GlassNode) September 25, 2025
Bitcoin accumulation sharply falls amid the cooling of whale activity
In line with exclusive market statistics, Bitcoin accumulation trend scores present an astonishing picture. The indicator visualizes the price action of the major crypto tokens along with accumulation activity. In particular, Bitcoin accumulation has reportedly declined significantly over the last few months. This overall shift points to the reluctance of $BTC investors, particularly large entities, to engage in active accumulation.
Separately, accumulated trend scores also serve as a prominent emotional indicator. It often helps to assess whether long-term Bitcoin holders are building positions. An increase in score usually indicates a strong conviction and bullish outlook. Meanwhile, as in the current scenario, softening scores emphasize risk aversion and hesitation. With this in mind, a decline in accumulation levels can make it difficult for the market to handle sell-side pressure, especially if short-term $BTC holders begin to make profits.
The decline in institutional activity raises sustainability concerns1
According to GlassNode, the ongoing Bitcoin accumulation lull could pave the way for supply overhangs. So, if there is no renewed demand, if $BTCCOINS is participating in distribution, it could compete for purchase rights, particularly ignite a price correction. This careful setting also reflects macro uncertainty and emotional changes. Though a small number of market participants still operate in the retail sector, facility flow appears to be suppressed, indicating a decline in accumulation and raising sustainability concerns.
