Bitcoin Core is in front of the intersection of future development

The Bitcoin (BTC) developer community is immersed in new debates about possible changes to Bitcoin Core, the basic software that implements network consensus rules and allows anyone from a node to verify and block transactions independently.

Bitcoin Optch’s Bulletin No. 344 stands out for the vision of several Bitcoin collaborators and developers. Take this opportunity to see Antoine Poinsotto, Anthony Towns and David Harding revolve around questions whose opinions are central to the question. How should Bitcoin Core evolve to ensure both network security and ease of use for participants?

Poindot proposals on project structure

In a series of publications, Poinsot states, “Bitcoin Core should be a robust spine for the Bitcoin network, balancing software protection and implementation of new features to enhance the ecosystem.”

Poinsot proposes splitting the Bitcoin core into three independent projects. Nodes (in charge of blockchain verification), wallets (to manage funds), and graphical user interfaces (GUIs).

The idea is based on a multi-process subproject, a multi-year effort to separate the functionality of a program into different processes. For Poinsot, This rebuild makes each component easier to maintain and update. It provides flexibility and agility to development.

The hypothesis is that as long as the wallet and GUI continue, they can develop individually. It will definitely interact Comes with main node.

The town’s vision and his questions

Anthony Towns has taken the division skeptical. “Components will continue to unite strongly.” And changes to the region will likely require changes from others. It’s far from simplifying development, which adds a layer of complexity and makes maintenance tedious.

For him, the real profit lies in moving to the library or external tools. Node-directly-dependent functionsAs a specific network rate that allows users to easily connect to their nodes without adding complexity to their main project.

According to the town, it would allow developers Focus on a specific area It has not been changed Software core. In fact, he points out that some users already employ creative solutions. Use middleware (intermediate software) that uses blockchain rates to connect your wallet to your own nodes and create a kind of personalized explorer.

David Harding worries about everyday users

Meanwhile, David Harding is concerned about focusing on the user experience. Complex Transaction Verification For those who do not have a wide range of technical resources. It argues that the ability of each person to operate a complete node is essential to storing protocol rules.

He describes the consensus parameters as “even a 30 minute change.”Change the basic characteristics of Bitcoina currency limit of 21 million has been issued. ”

In Harding, individual users are committed to important Bitcoin characteristics than organizations that use nodes operated by third parties to provide services. Therefore, if network integrity is assessed, we conclude that individual nodes should be executed and transaction validation should have the same priorities as correcting critical security errors.

Meaning and emotion in the Bitcoin ecosystem

These approaches relate to different groups in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Node operators influence the sorting of possible software. Adapt to new tools To manage your wallet.

Minors have not been directly changed to the block verification task, but they may be affected by the possible changes to the validation policy and the way consensus updates are implemented.

End users, especially those using Bitcoin core wallets or tools that rely on this client, have difficulty when they experience improvements in usability, or, rather, when development is concentrated purely on the technical aspects.

Pondot’s proposal, town doubts, and Harding’s warnings reflect the complexity of evolution software We maintain a global network. Each adjustment in Bitcoin Core should take into account not only its technical impact, but also its consequences for the community that uses it.