Disclosure: The opinions and opinions expressed here belong to the authors solely and do not represent the views or opinions of the crypto.news editorial.
The domination of Ethereum (ETH) is faced with a delicate challenge in the basic layers. Although it focuses on making the underlying technology better and faster, other networks are primarily Solana (SOL), and have experienced significant growth in the number of apps that people can use. This makes me wonder if Ethereum’s current way of doing things is supporting or hurting the ability to attract and retain those who build these apps.
You might like it too: Ethereum Paradox: Is it too big to fail or too late and important? |Opinion
The idea of a new app faces many tough questions, scrutinized and challenged by the “ecosystem police.” This makes it less appealing to try new ideas in Ethereum than to be more open to people trying new things. Thus, talented builders choose a Cabal who open their arms and will welcome them by bringing benefits to the ecosystem and creating a positive environment for the builders.
Grow all kinds of ideas and stop policing
Ethereum’s community and leadership should be more open to ingenuity and crazy ideas, even things that may seem just for risk and fun. Not every new project has to be a world-changing infrastructure or technology. Apps that attract many users may be apps that are more experimental or focused on new trends. You need to appreciate the energy and interest these types of apps bring to the ecosystem. The recent success of “Degen” shows apps that focus on apps like Pump.Fun and platform.
Solana’s success shows this as evidenced by the rapid user acquisition of platforms like Pump.Fun. They have supported the project. This has led to network adoption and growth even for projects that have just started or explored new fields.
Ethereum can learn from this by recognizing that it’s not too fast to reject these types of projects and the possibility of growing your entire user base.
Communication with everyday users
Ethereum focuses on technical improvements as a team. While these are important to the developer community, they do not mean regular internet users or degrees looking for new and exciting opportunities and experiences. Specifically, people want to know what can be done with all these new primitives or apps.
Other networks do a better job of showcasing apps built on them. Focusing on these money support has attracted Legos to talent, users and network use.
Obviously, Ethereum doesn’t have this. I’m a critical of Ethereum, so I’m avid supporter and user.
Make app growth a priority
You need to work proactively to build more apps and try more users out there. This means not only improving the technology, but also creating clear plans.
One way to do this is to create special teams within the Ethereum ecosystem, focusing on helping new apps grow across the spectrum, from serious tools to fun experiments. One of the most important goals for this team is to find promising projects and understand what they need help. A focused effort to help Ethereum apps succeed will create space for builders to experiment, although not directly controlled by the Ethereum Foundation for day-to-day operations.
Ethereum has a strong foundation and can activate ecosystems. By becoming more open to all kinds of apps, supporting them, and creating special teams to help your app grow, Ethereum can move the app ecosystem back on.
Ethereum’s future success depends not only on its technology, but also on the number of useful and fun apps that people can actually use.
read more: Reports of Ethereum’s death are highly exaggerated | Opinion
Nirbhik Jangid
Nirbhik Jangid He is a veteran builder and growth leader in the Web3 space. As the founder of the DAPP list, he created a go-to platform for discovering promising projects and Dapps. His experience also included a significant contribution to polygons (matic), where he played an important role in his early growth.
