The discussion of the impact of quantum computing on Bitcoin (BTC) and other digital security systems is fed by uncertainty about how this technology can convert a cryptographically active cryptography ecosystem based on encryption.
In this regard, Jameson Lopp, Software Engineer Bitconner In an article published on March 16th, Wallet Casa Hodol’s co-founder was Burn with forgotten or lost btc wallet oldis potentially vulnerable to future quantum advances.
Maintain individual sovereignty, LOPP motivation
The heart of the LOPP discussion is “defense of the basic values of Bitcoin.” Resistance to censorship, immutability, and personal sovereignty About assets.
If a quantum enemy manages forgotten funds, the mantra “not your key, not your coin” is violated. For him, this scenario not only affects unsuspecting users; Erodes confidence in Bitcoin As a safe and decentralized system.
Lopp says that quantum recovery in Bitcoin is not a neutral phenomenon; Forced redistribution of wealth. He said allowing these funds to be billed by those who control quantum technology would mean technological advances in the value of unsuspecting users.
«Allowing quantum recovery of Bitcoin is equivalent to redistribution of wealth. What we allow is that Bitcoin will be redistributed to quantum computers to those who have acquired technical careers to acquire quantum computers».
Jameson Race, Kohndador decasahodor.
Furthermore, Bitcoin engineers and defenders reject the concept (published in his own article) that deciphering keys with quantum technology is equivalent to traditional mining. According to LOPP, participants in the Bitcoin ecosystem can argue that technical efforts to exploit vulnerable wallets justify their “recovery.”
LOPP breaks down that idea through analogy. “In the same sense that the thief won his booty for the resources to invest in monitoring the target and learn the skills needed to enter the building,” this is equivalent. Mixing of funds other than illegal activitiesregardless of the technical benefits involved.
“After much consideration, I think it would be better to burn coins that are vulnerable to quantum computing.”
Jameson Race, Kohndador decasahodor.
LOPP Solution: Burn vulnerable BTC
Given this panorama, LOPP proposes precautions. We then establish the term “BTC is burned or frozen in a fragile direction.” Permanently removed from the circulation or immobilized.
This action will encourage users, as Jameson Rop arranged Transfer funds to quantum resistance addresses,As a result of alternative crypto companies (e.g., Lamport and Winternitz), these are independent of a number of factors.
“When vulnerable users can delay updates indefinitely, there is more delay and leaves the most exposed network when quantum technology becomes available.”
Jameson Race, Kohndador decasahodor.
However, this proposal is not exempt from the dilemma. Burning these BTCs means sacrificeing funds that may belong to a legal and living owner. LOPP is aware of this cost I think it’s a small evil We faced an alternative that entities with quantum capacity allocated these Bitcoins.
In that case, damages are not limited to individual losses, Bitcoin’s reliability is suppressed As a value warehouse and a reliable system.
BTC burning will reduce supply
The LOPP approach shows that when vulnerable funds fall into actors using sophisticated technology based on quantum technology, the market faces sudden BTC injections, changing its economy and creating mistrust.
On the contrary, burning them reduces the circulation supply. This is similar to what happened with historically lost Bitcoin, but intentionally and controlled. According to this approach, Lopp says it will strengthen its network by enforcing large-scale updates towards safer standards.
la estrategenia lace
Combustion implementation is not easy. Consensus between nodes of the network is required. Protocol changeswhich complicated the decentralized nature of Bitcoin. However, LOPP argues that passivity simply “advances risk” and that more bitcoin will be exposed as quantum technology advances.
The strategy consists of establishing the height or time of a particular block. Bitcoin nodes will stop accepting Transactions that use funds script (Code Fragment) Quantum is not resistant. This approach I’ll try to force it Gradual transition Towards a more secure encryption scheme, eliminate the risk of actors with Quantum Technology and leverage funds with outdated scripts, such as forgotten things in old wallets.
To carry out this fiery burn, Lopp proposes a step-by-step approach, prioritizing the most exposed funds. Like a script P2PK (Pay-to-public-Key) Or someone whose public key has been revealed For address reuse.
However, it warns that this additional complexity can cause controversy between users and developers. However, it’s a simpler approach that covers everything script Lopp is aware of this magnitude change as it could be vulnerable at once Faced with technical and social challenges With the Bitcoin ecosystem.
What deadline does Jameson Ropp propose?
Regarding deadlines, LOPP estimates that software wallets will be required for at least one year for updates, and believes that wallet hardware can employ post-facto encryption with firmware updates. Furthermore, he calculates that it is necessary to migrate funds. Block space for at least 6 months.
Finally, he emphasizes, “To maintain a reasonable maintenance of Bitcoin’s conservatism, it is desirable to allow a four-year transition window.” In the event of a quantum attacker, the mining pool can adjust the soft branching (Soft fork) Protect your network more quickly with emergencies to accelerate the burning of vulnerable funds.
As reported by Cryptootics, analysts view quantum threats as a further distant risk for Bitcoin, but this issue continues to create controversy. Jameson Lopp’s proposals and other community actors reflect efforts to predict the future of Quantum, and continue to live out the quest for solutions to protect cryptocurrency.
(tagstotranslate)bitcoin(btc)
