Michael Sayler in a recent Bitcoin Policy Institute event speech It is closely aligned Major Jason Lowry’s “Soft Whirl” paper andframing Bitcoin as a key defense mechanism, rather than just a financial asset.
Saylor highlighted Bitcoin’s role as a “digital defense system,” equating its open and distributed energy flow with the strategic military defense of cyberspace.
Reflecting Lowery’s softwal theory, he argued that Bitcoin management is essential for national security. He specifically highlighted Bitcoin’s defense capabilities against sophisticated threats, including artificial intelligence systems.
During the talk, Saylor highlighted the strength of the network, saying that the “800 exahashes” of encryption formed an inexplicable barrier to AI attacks, and that Elon Musk refers to comments that AI is difficult to hack Bitcoin. Bitcoin Startup Authln has already built such technology using the Lightning Network to make Brute Force a financially inefficient hack for bad actors.
Saylor has positioned the immeasurable hash power of the network as an unprecedented shield protecting economic values and national security.
Combined with Lowery’s strategic framing, Saylor argued that losing control of Bitcoin means losing its advantage over cyberspace.
He said that failure to maintain this control could potentially be blocked from important sea routes and endanger serious economic disruptions similar to referring to historical precedents in war and economic competition.
Saylor has highlighted the strategy’s own substantial financial commitment to approximately 2.4% of Bitcoin’s network to sought immediate and important national investment in Bitcoin and demonstrated the strategic and economic significance of Bitcoin.
The urgency of his speech reflects Laurie’s claim that the state must actively participate in the Bitcoin hash race to ensure strategic advantages without resorting to violence.
Saylor concludes that Bitcoin represents America’s “manifesto fate,” and frags the options as “prosperity or poverty” as either “prosperity or poverty” based on whether the nation effectively utilizes the strategic value of Bitcoin.
It is mentioned in this article
(tagstotranslate)Bitcoin
