Two Bitcoin wallets that analysts have linked to Silk Road-era activity last moved 3,421 BTC in May of this year. Now, the subsequent activity on December 10 added a new pulse to a year in which dormant supplies were awakened.
According to Digital Watch Observatory, total spending in May was approximately 3,421 BTC, or approximately $322.5 million at the time.
This sequence included a spend of 2,343 BTC at a block height of 895,421 rerouting the output to a new SegWit address pattern.
On-chain forensics shows 31 outputs consolidated into a new P2WPKH destination, a pattern more consistent with custodial control than instant exchange escrow.
On December 10th, trackers flagged additional consolidations totaling just over $3 million from over 300 wallets labeled as linked to Silk Road, continuing to focus on these addresses and prompting near-term judgments about whether labels or routing are more important for price discovery.
Although December flows were small compared to May flows in BTC terms, they were still timely given the new sensitivity to old coin movements this year.
That sensibility is shaped by an episode in which government-controlled Silk Road coins were sent to Coinbase Prime, which traders are treating as a pre-sale move.
The US government transferred 10,000 BTC to Coinbase Prime in August 2024 and approximately 19,800 BTC in December 2024, but these transfers coincided with short-term risk-off positions in the days before and after the transfers.
Provenance is important in this story
The May wallet was first created in July 2013 and then remained silent for about 11-12 years before being disbursed. This fixes the setup of the dormant supply narrative.
The production structure during the May sequence leaned toward consolidation and rekeying using the new Bech32 custody destination rather than the exchange label deposit heuristic.
This distinction will drive trader reaction, as flows to Coinbase Prime and other prime broker venues are treated as short-term supply, while internal integration into P2WPKH does not imply imminent distribution.
A practical way to compare scale and routing is to juxtapose Silk Road-related wallet movements with two previous US government transfers that influenced Coinbase Prime.
The amounts involved in 2024 are orders of magnitude larger than dormant wallet spending in May 2025, which helps explain why market participants prefer exchange-tagged receipts over unlabeled consolidations.
| date window | controller/label | Amount (BTC) | Approximately US$ (at that time) | routing pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5-7, 2025 | Wallet linked to Silk Road | 3,421 | ~$322.5 million | Integration into new P2WPKH |
| August 2024 | US government seizes the Silk Road | 10,000 | ~$600 million | Go to Coinbase Prime |
| December 2024 | US government seizes the Silk Road | ～19,800 | ~$2 billion | Go to Coinbase Prime |
| December 10, 2025 | Wallet linked to Silk Road | ~$3 million equivalent | — | Subsequent integration |
The Silk Road coin category has a long public history through auctions, seizures, and recent transfers through exchange channels. In 2014, the US Marshals Service auctioned off 29,656 BTC seized from Silk Road, which was won by Tim Draper, establishing an early strategy for transparent liquidation.
This auction demonstrated that official supply can be planned and absorbed without opaque drips. The approach has evolved. Subsequently, the Department of Justice and IRS-CI seized 69,370 BTC associated with “Individual
A 2023 court filing outlined a gradual liquidation of approximately 41,490 BTC from Zhong’s cash during 2023, which provided the market with preliminary visibility of the execution, but still left timing risks around the remittance date.
Labels and routing are now at the center of traders’ interpretations
Coinbase Prime receipts, or other exchange-labeled custody endpoints, could be read as a precursor to distribution via OTC or block trades, which could compress basis and move funding closer to neutrality as a desk inventory hedge.
In contrast, integration into a new P2WPKH address is consistent with internal rekeying or moving to an updated storage stack, making an immediate sale less likely.
The May 2025 path fits into the latter mold, while the large government transfer in 2024 fits into the former, which is causing option skew to become put-heavy and triggering implied volatility to pop on the short tenor.
The December 2025 market structure adds a new layer. Record outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs in November, followed by renewed inflows in early December, have traders focused on the balance between passive demand and labeled supply.
Weekly fund flow fluctuations remain the most frequent barometer of direction, and flows can offset or amplify signals from labeled on-chain transfers. If the exchange tag is not visible after a labeled wallet spends, the realized volatility will tend to revert to its mean value as liquidity providers normalize their inventory.
40-55% of the time, a benign integration path involves continued migration to a new SegWit or Bech32 repository without replacement tags. As a result, headline windows will get shorter, option skew will fade, and we will likely see a return to an ETF-driven tape.
There is a 25-35% chance that a stealth OTC distribution channel will see coins sent to prime brokers like Coinbase Prime, which then go through block trades to create mild and sustained ask-side pressure, compressing basis while funding moderates.
A headline-driven 10-20% de-risking path would require large new government transfers in the 10,000-20,000 BTC range coinciding with days of weak ETF flows, which could cause miners and permanent traders to sell on this move, triggering a sharp decline. The 2024 Relocation Handbook is the perfect analogue for that third scenario.
Dormant wallet reactivation pattern in 2025 increases label risk premium
There have been multiple awakenings from the Satoshi era this year, with waves of generations entering the fourth quarter having spent more than seven years. This helps explain why even the modest moves of Silk Road-related labels in December are still recorded in their positioning.
That said, on-chain details are still the first filter. P2WPKH’s integration, new custody, and lack of exchange-labeled receipts within 24-72 hours are consistent with poor price follow-through in previous litigation.
Conversely, the Arkham Alert and Whale Alert flags that explicitly point to Coinbase Prime receipts, when combined with the US noon print, are consistent with short-term inventory hedges, widening short-term put skews, and soft bases.
History provides the foundation. The first large-scale public liquidation, conducted through the USMS Auction in 2014, showed that planned and transparent sales can be absorbed. Subsequent seizures, including 69,370 BTC associated with “Individual
A 2025 court decision refused to block the sale of 69,370 BTC cash individually, effectively leaving the legal channel open.
For immediate tapes, the watchlist is easy. Look for receipts with exchange labels, especially Coinbase Prime, a few days after new spending related to Silk Road.
We track the direction of daily ETF flows as the interaction between passive demand and labeled supply determines whether headlines fade or encourage broader risk aversion. We monitor the options face for short-term bias toward puts, as well as rapid changes in the futures base on perpetual funding and transfer dates to inform positioning.
However, given that billions of dollars worth of Bitcoin are now being absorbed by ETF liquidity on a regular weekly basis, it is unlikely that the Silk Road sale will have a material impact on Bitcoin prices without some psychological catalyst.
According to Digital Watch Observatory, the May 2025 pattern indicates more consolidation than dispersion, and the December 10th activity continues to be consistent with that base case until an exchange tag appears.
(Tag translation) Bitcoin
