A gentle consensus will one day reign. The hierarchy of values that govern society is clear and determined. Everyone agrees. Suddenly, sudden changes interrupt the way of life. People start to face it. First, in words. Then at the club. They create denominations and aspects. In a violent process, leaders promise new orders. Each offers a different north of the Bethlehem star.
Some people don’t seduce those that create confusion. Looking for security, they prefer to refer to their ancestors to their defined past. Ancestors…If they could ever transport the light of life, should they know nothing about him? Is the formula for a critical issue likely lies in legacy?
Bitcoin cut the placenta with his father, but the words of Nakamoto at, the creator of Bitcoin, They emerge as a book of consultation at the high point of discussion Main software that runs the protocol within the Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Knot promoters.
It is clear that Bitcoin no longer belongs to Sato, and there is no guarantee that the protocol will adhere (or should) to the original model. In that sense, their ideas apply to Bitcoin, with op_return and inscriptions being relatively, reinterpreted or completely ignored.
But for those with ears, Satoshi has something to say about what Bitcoin is. Or, in addition, it acts as a moderator for future discussions. The idea of the inventors of Cryptoactive helps organize discussions to destroy new myths. Pruning the quality of your opponent’s argument.
Things you can never say about Satoshi That he viewed Bitcoin as an absolute (or absolute) system of e-money.. Proof of this is easy to give. Just look at the origin of the cryptographic effect and find the digital inscriptions engraved by Nakamoto himself.
Times 03/January 3, 2009 The bank’s prime minister is on the verge of a second bailout for the bank.
Nakamoto at, Genesis block.
The phrase translated “Times 03/January 2009: Prime Minister at the edge of the second rescue of the bank.”
Mining destroys the X account, one of the bitcoin mining events in which Cryptootics exists, and makes it clear that Satoshi did not “register” the famous owner of The Times using Segwit or Op_return. Meanwhile, he did it in the entry field (scriptsig) of the Coinbase transaction. Genesis Block.
The Genesis block code features (unknown whether it was due to Satoshi’s error) consider the first mining grant in history (50 BTC) to be intact.
In addition to acting as the first link in an immutable blockchain that has been extended to this day, it is not strange to confirm that the case of BTC’s initial use was storage and transmission and/or data communication, which itself had no financial end. So there’s no way to defend it (and I don’t think anyone has done it). Nakamoto AT was opposed to the non-monetary use of Bitcoin.
Since any data was born in Bitcoin, all discussion of inscriptions within the system must work on a mitigation basis. They are not the products of digitally evolved mutant reptiles.
The emotional position in discussion tends to be extreme, but technical arguments do not. As reported by Cryptoics, the battle between Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Knot is not determined by the fundamental entry within the system or by the complete ban on any data. Rather, in the case of Bitcoin, the battle is decided. It becomes a protocol with broad limitations of non-mortal functions.
Therefore, Satoshi is excluded from thinking of registration as a gross or prohibitive.
As the encryption of that time was presumed and now mentions that he is a maximalist of Bitcoin@thevladcostea, Satoshi may have had a broad concept at least initially about the purpose and utility of Bitcoin.
The first version of Bitcoin Core Includes unfinished codes for eBay style e-market and casinos with bitcoin. These codes («cpokerdialogbase», «cpokerlobbydialogbase», «market.cpp») They can be understood as the scheme of Bitcoin’s first decentralized application.
Today they survive as fragments. Satoshi didn’t mind hiding or eliminating them. This makes it difficult to regret non-financial use with Bitcoin.
@thevladcosta also quotes Nakamoto’s Satojima post dated December 9, 2019. Considering the possibility of practicing dual mining between BTC and BITDNSBitcoin Domain Name Project token. Today, dual mining is real (like Bitcoin and fractal Bitcoin).
Satoshi explores further his playing with the possibilities of Bitcoin If you fantasize with an immeasurable interconnected network without division:
Instead of fragmentation, the network shares and increases the total power of the CPU with each other. This solves the problem that if you have several networks, if the available CPU powers are combined into one, they are at risk to each other. Meanwhile, all networks in the world share the total power of the CPU and increase the total power. This makes it easier to start small networks by utilizing available miners.
Nakamoto AT, creator of Bitcoin.
On June 17, 2010, Satoshi, a user of X known as @kyl ___ 10, said he wanted to acknowledge all possible types of transactions.
The nature of Bitcoin is like when version 0.1 is released, its central design was recorded in stone for the remainder of its useful life. So I wanted to design it and acknowledge all sorts of possible transactions that occurred to me. The problem was that, whether everything is being used or not, a special support code and data field was required, and at the same time only covers special cases. It would have been an explosion of a special case. The solution is a script, which generalizes the problem so that the part that creates the transaction can describe the transaction as a predicate that evaluates the node network. The node must understand the transaction to the point where it evaluates whether the sender’s criteria are met.
Nakamoto AT, creator of Bitcoin.
Thus, evidence accumulates that Satoshi has seen a multi-purpose protocol that opens up to lateral development in Bitcoin and expands in different directions. Your thinking and protocol about non-financial use on the network will definitely leave you with: Bitcoin is an open system For novelty.
Now, it’s more difficult and unacceptable bold to fit their views into discussions about data sales between op_return and core and knots. Particularly because neither of the two clients repeats repeatedly to ban non-monetary use cases of Bitcoin, such as inscriptions.
Using version 30 of the client released in October, if the limit increases to 100,000 bytes, it appears to encourage them (core) or do that.
The other (the knot) limits them, but more precisely, maintains a conservative default threshold for this type of transaction: 83 bytes.
In fact, although he worked actively in the protocol, Satoshi never saw that the use of non-monatary transactions exceeded money. I don’t know if they wanted to strengthen the limits of Bitcoin’s capabilities in the presence of such facts and to completely devote it to its main essence.
However, the evidence suggests that Nakamoto is a promoter of BTC’s non-financial use and that it is not strange when examining Core’s decision regarding the future of Bitcoin. However, the atshi arrived and revealed it. On the other hand, we prefer to keep our doubts.
(tagstotranslate)Bitcoin (BTC)
