In the US, Bitcoin (BTC) legal protections and other digital assets are progressing with solid steps. Two state laws already guarantee this right to users, while four additional legislative projects are looking to take part in this trend in 2025.
Kentucky has now become a second state in protecting the ability of people to manage cryptocurrency without intermediaries, reporting on law HB 701, signed by Gov. Andy Besher on March 25, 2025. Previously, Oklahoma had taken its first step with a law approved in May 2024. This prohibits government agencies from limiting this practice.
These regulations prevent states from restricting or banning citizens To maintain financial autonomy in the cryptocurrency field.
Essentially, self-occustomism means having complete control over Bitcoin or digital assets without relying on third parties such as banks or exchange platforms. This is achieved through the use of software installed on personal or hardware devices, such as physical devices similar to USB memory storing private keys, and code needed to access and manage funds.
In fact, if his Bitcoin is solely responsible for his safety, it means protecting those keys from robbery, loss, or technical failure. Kentucky laws expressly protect this right; Users can manipulate nodes, weaken and use cryptocurrency Without fear of state intervention, Oklahoma norms establish that public institutions cannot prevent this freedom.
In 2025, the impulse of US states presenting a project to protect their own systems remains unstoppable. South Carolina introduced the S 163 project, Ohio State and HB 116, announced in January 2025, in February 2025, and also recorded a mass on the SB 614 in January this year.
Meanwhile, California has presented Project AB 1052. The case stands out in its scope, allowing the state’s 39.4 million residents to manage their digital assets without restrictions.
All of these projects are early in the legislative process and in some cases, such as South Carolina, await first discussion at the plenary session. And others, such as Ohio and Mithri, who are rarely on the first committee.
Clear language
These initiatives share a clear discussion: prevent state officials from banning, restricting or undermining human capabilities Use your digital assets to purchase legitimate goods and services.
Additionally, they provide that the state does not prohibit it, and that it uses a self-existing wallet or third-party portfolio to limit or undermine your own body digital assets.
In Ohio, text adds precision. “No divisions, agencies, or organizations of this state, or political subdivisions of this state will prohibit, limit or harm the ability to obtain custody of digital assets using hardware wallets or wallets they contain.” These provisions seek to protect users against government attempts to limit control over digital funds.
Generally, these measures translate the key principles of cryptocurrency, financial sovereignty, with concrete rights protected by law. However, responsibility rests on the user. Losing a private key is equivalent to losing access to funds; There is no chance that they will rely on centralized entities to recover them.
As pointed out by the Sato Action Fund Organization behind all US legislative advances, laws defending Bitcoin’s right to exist protect “the will of millions of Americans to use BTC and cryptocurrency” without discrimination.
In fact, progress in these laws reflects a change in the way states perceive cryptocurrency as a legitimate tool worthy of protection.
Currently, states such as Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Ohio, California and Mithri are taking the lead, so maps of the area are drawn. They bet on empowering users It faces possible restrictions.
Kentucky Sen. Steve Rawlings believes that most of the electronic form requires financial intermediaries such as banks and cryptocurrencies. Own and control digital assets and use them as fiat currency.
For him, if Kentucky is guaranteed to be able to exercise these options, “it will promote individual financial freedom and be maintained federally alongside the president (Donald Trump) and those struggling to protect our economic future.”
What does this actually mean?
The law protecting the self-ocustody of Bitcoin means that individuals are right to store and control cryptocurrencies such as BTC directly, directly, directly, directly, directly, directly, directly, directly, directly, We don’t rely on intermediaries such as banks or third party platforms.
In other words, the law ensures that people manage their private keys and have the freedom to use their digital assets without excessive government restrictions There is no requirement to delegate that custody to an agency.. This reinforces the fundamental principles behind financial freedom, personal autonomy, and cryptocurrency.
The self-reliance law can establish that the government cannot seize a person’s Bitcoin without a clear and justified legal process (as a court order). For example, if someone has five BTCs in their personal wallet, then the authorities They were unable to request you to deliver your private key without a valid reason.
Meanwhile, the law could be comparable to cashing out Bitcoin’s self-ocastodies at home. For example, if a person uses a cold wallet (a physical device such as a Trezor or Ledger) to store 10 BTC, the law protects the device as personal property. Prevent regulations that require these funds to be deposited in a bank or exchange.
Furthermore, the law allows merchants to accept BTC payments directly from client wallets without requiring them to pass through a regulated payment processor. For example, a Kentucky cafeteria could receive 0.00005 BTC for coffee, and the law would guarantee both clients and trade They are free to do the transaction without third party intervention.
For users, laws protecting Bitcoin’s self-occustody means not only legal certainty but greater economic freedom. In addition to promoting daily life if he is a regular user of cryptocurrency.
For example, when someone arrives at a Kentucky airport with wallet hardware in their pocket. Under Law HB 701, state authorities no longer – in theory, they cannot confiscate it. It also doesn’t require you to just own it and reveal your private key. Of course, thisif there is no evidence of illegal conduct.
Another case is that, as the 2024 law protects his activities, Ohio merchants can already accept Bitcoin without worrying about the state’s legal obstacles. Additionally, Kentucky miners can already manipulate nodes with legal assistance. Californians were able to carry digital wallets without fear of sanctions or persecution, but only if regulations were approved.
However, not everything is automatic. Regulations in these states do not affect federal lawstherefore, institutions such as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Equity Securities Commission (SEC) can continue their own rules, particularly in issues of fiscal or national security.
where are you going?
The spread of these laws raises questions about the future.
On the one hand, it strengthens the decentralized philosophy that produced Bitcoin created by Nakamoto at in 2009 to avoid the dependence of intermediaries. Meanwhile, he tests the government’s ability to balance individual freedoms To prevent illegal activities such as money laundering.
As 2025 progresses, panoramas suggest a clear trend, and nations recognize that cryptocurrencies are not fashion that passes through, However, the reality demands an adapted legal framework.
Kentucky and Oklahoma were already taking a step forward, with South Carolina, Ohio, California and Mithri able to follow quickly. For users, this means more control over digital money, but also reminders. Freedom involves the task of protecting itboth external threats and unique errors.
In a world where digital and physics are increasingly intertwined, these laws invite us to reflect. Time and Congress will say that.
(TagStoTRASSLATE)Bitcoin (BTC)(T)Cryptocurrency(T)Highlights(T)US(T)Wallet(Wallet)
